Monday, October 27, 2014

Chapter 2 of "god's Emmisary"

I write a lot, this is just been fun. I wrote chapter one and posted it here for a little while, here is chapter two. It makes you think. And I was asked on Facebook if it was true, well, I've never been institutionalized...

Chapter 2

He was ushered into the sterile utilitarian office and looked at the same chair from before.  It was soft, slightly worn from the multitude of bottoms that had sat there before him. A lot of bottoms had rested there, and as he thought about how one's bottom would make a different impression for those that were sane, or not, he realized it was difficult to determine. Then came the thought that the chair might possibly exude some causative force that made those sitting there insane. That was a realization that he just might have been confined here too long already. He sat nevertheless and smiled at the doctor. It had been nearly a month since they had first met. Certainly an indication that she felt he was not in need of daily counseling. His bottom must have been assessed as sane.
"So Mr. Marshall, how have you been?"
"Good Doc, good, thank you. My sinus problems are back, but all in all, good."
"Yes, I see you saw the GP here. Anyway, I'm very curious as to what's been going on with the other thing we talked about. Any progress."
"Yes, sort of. I was with god right after we spoke. god was interested in what we spoke about. I relayed what I could remember of our conversation."
"What, I don't understand. Doesn't, well, wouldn't god already know what we spoke about?"
"Well, I don't know. god requested that I tell him, and we discussed it in great detail. But as to whether or not god was already aware of that which transpired, I don't believe so. There were a lot of questions."
"Was god perhaps just testing you, determining your level of understanding?"
"Well that's one possibility. It certainly is possible that god wanted to determine the extent of my own personal commitment to this endeavor as well as, well, yours."
"Yes, I see. I'm now an integral part of this aren't I?"
"Very much so doc. And it seems as though god approves of your concept of introducing a new paradigm of faith. We in fact talked at length about what I should write and what to present to the public. In fact god gave me a great deal of new information to begin."
She sat back in her chair, and tilted her head to the side, visibly interested in what he was about to say next. She asked, "What new info?"
"Well, we began at the beginning.  Creation."
"The Creation, wow.  From god. Now, I'm intrigued." And she sat up straight in her chair.
"Well, don't get to excited. Creation is a bit of an over simplification. It isn't the book of Genesis version at all.  Nothing monumental."
"Okay, so give it to me."
"Well, it seems that in the beginning, there was light."
She waited a few moments for him to continue, and when he didn't, she asked, "That's it?"
"Sort of. Remember when we talked and I told you that god, and others. had said that all of us are composed of the basic part of the universe? Light."
"Yes, it was a big part of our discussion."
"Well it goes deeper than that, light is the basis of not just life, but the essence of creation itself."
"I don't understand."
"Well let me see if I can explain it.  Man, well, humans, need a beginning. the universe itself has no such designation, beginning, existence, finality. The universe is. It just is, period. So for humans to better understand, we need to have this beginning. This is the one that god provided for me as one that humanity is capable of understanding. There was a sea of spirit, of oneness.  It was all, it encompassed everything.  It was all of space, all of time, all of thought.  It was awareness. All, everything. For us, we can visualize the all as having contemplated what was. And yes, it is circular, what was, what is, what will be, are in fact part of the All. The spirit, that which was all, withdrew into itself until all of space was empty. However it is something we as mere mortals cannot grasp this awakening of the spirit and the beginning of individuality. Part of that which was all, awakened and became aware of itself. This was self awareness.  Or perhaps vanity."
He could see within her a look of complete frustration.  And she began with a question, "This is more than a bit confusing. Or is it just me?"
"No Doc, it is confusing. But think of it all like this.  An ant, thinks, however primitive its thoughts might be, it is aware of its environment, hunger, and of course its instinctive drive to live.  Our ant is born, nurtured in a loving environment then when mature it goes out into the world to do the duty prescribed by its place within its societal parameters here on this plane of existence. Our ant may in fact look up into the night sky and see stars, might even wonder about the universe, but those things are outside the ability of the ant to understand anything more than eat, work and avoid the giant humans that stomp on it."
"Mr. Marshall, we're not ants."
"Of course not, but we are however confined within our framework of understanding by not only the constraints of what can be accepted by the parameters that guide our own society but by the possibility that our physical minds are just not capable of the comprehension of our universe in its entirety in much the same way as our friend the ant can't conceive of making a spaceship and flying to the bright object in the sky.  It is barely within our ability to even imagine the infinite distances between galaxies in the universe, and that is just one of the basic ideas in this universe.  That vastness dwarfs our ability to conceptualize the universe as anything but this giant, well, no, inconceivably gigantic place where there is nothing, and we are but a spec of dust on a world that in itself is massive to our thinking.  For god, the universe is. There is no difficulty conceiving size differentials such as what we must do. Here on earth we live, to us the universe is infinite.  To god, the universe just simply is.  And there are a multitude of concepts that god exists with and is now attempting to define calculus to the ant. In other words, me."
"I think I understand, what you're saying is that the universe is much more complex than what our minds are capable of understanding and that god considers us like the ants?" She said in a sort of questioning way.
"Well, sort of, I don't think god has actually specifically told me that particular metaphor. The fact is god is very patient, god explains things, or tries to anyway, as simply as god believes I am capable of understanding.  And there are many many times when I ask, and am told that the answer is outside my realm of comprehension.  You know, when god says that, I believe it.
“Okay Mr. Marshall, back up just a sec, just to clarify for me, that is if you know, according to what you said regarding past, present and future being all one, is there a future, a separate timeline that we must travel through or is our future part of this beginning, part of the all?”
“Ah, yes, to both. From our perspective, we live in the present, we exist, perform daily functions, we live. When god is here with me, the same constraints of time exist for god as they do for us. And yet god exists outside this plane of existence as well and for god time is just another aspect of the universe.  When I asked about whether god then knows our future I was told that god exists within our timeline as do we and cannot know tomorrow. When we first met, the information on the paper about the suit you were wearing was given to me by god just before I came in to see you.”
She sat back in her chair, relaxed a bit and appeared to mull over the latest revelation.  Finally she began, “However, you also told me that god gave you specifics about others, and god knew things about my past. How?”
“Well, god chose people that came to the market, gave me particulars about them in the same way about you.”
“So god knows our past then?”
“Of course, that which was, is.  Our past is a part of this plane of existence and is accessible to god. And I know it's completely contradictory, but in that same vein, all time is part of the universe and as such god is aware of what was then, what is now and what is to be.”
“Mr. Marshall that doesn't make sense, if as you stated god knows what is to be then he is in fact prescient. Right?"
"Well think about it a minute. As I said, in this plane of existence. Here god follows the timeline we do. However god being god has greater ability and can see the past, but not the future since it hasn't happened in this plane of existence as of yet. This plane is but one of the seven planes of existence that make up the universe.  And that was what I was getting to about the beginning stuff.  We sort of have to understand the first part in order to get to the rest."
“The first part?"
"Yeah Doc, the whole reason why there are seven separate existences."
Sitting back again in her chair, she sighed then started, "Okay. I guess I should allow you to finish and not interrupt you. Go back to the beginning."
"Well it's pretty complex, and I admit to not understanding it much at all. The beginning really is just that there was light, the light is the basic building block of life, all of the universe was within what I think could be termed a big ball of light.  And then you know, to simplify it all there was consciousness and harmony and peace and all the songs styles of the sixties description of a wondrousness. At least god explains it like a sixties hippie."
"Really, like a hippie?"
"Yeah, I dunno, I mean I'm a kid from the sixties, maybe that's my point of reference. Anyway, what happened is that this big ball of light was in fact composed of individual consciousnesses, each having awareness of the whole, and of the self.  Some of them sort of got together and communed on the conscious level that they wanted to exist outside the community consciousness. To experience more, to be their own universe. So they broke off, became separate. And here is where it gets hard for me to understand, but according to god, being part of a copy of the whole is not as good as being part of the original whole. So the part wanted back, their pursuit of vanity, their troublesome teen years I guess, were unsuccessful.  So, the universe told the part, come on back, but prove to us, the universe, that you have learned that oneness is best.  And so the universe set forth seven planes of existence for them, meaning the individual collective consciousness that had in its own conceit separated from the universe; now had to exist within seven separate levels or planes of existence and learn from each. Now, the seven levels are   Arithmetic, Geometry, Balance, Harmony, Music, System and Eternity. And we are a part of the third, Balance. The thing to remember is that the universal consciousness is indeed one big thing, however it is made up of individual essences, us. Each of us, our conscious mind, is part of the big part. And we also have to understand that all life here on earth is part of the universe, every living thing has that spark of life, the essence of light."
"The spark of life?" she asked.
"Yeah, all life it would seem has something that non-living things don't have, that spark of life. And the reality is that it's visible as a tiny bit of light. The more complex the organism, the greater is the light coming from it."
"It actually sounds somewhat simplistic. Almost Sunday school explanation for kids. Just a few questions Mr. Marshall, I hope you can answer them. Are we living here, in this plane of existence, within the time frame and simultaneous of the other six, or do we live them consecutively?
"Oh, nice, very nice question. Doctor, the universe is all things, time included. Time as we perceive it exists in this plane of existence for us to live according to the laws of physics set forth for us. This existence along with the other six are all part of the universe as a whole and all exist individually and in total all that was, all that is and all that will be. What we perceive as the now, is in fact NOW.  The future may in fact exist as a sum total of all things in the universe, for the universe, but we perceive the present, and can change and alter our futures by our actions here in plane three as well as in each of the other six planes as well when we consciously exist in those planes. What that means is that nothing is set in stone, even though for the universe, everything has already happened in each plane that we exist in. And the big concept here is that even though the future has already happened, it is outside our realm of perception and we still have to live our lives, make decisions, perform actions in order to get to that future. And as before when we spoke about god knowing the future, god is for now existing in our plane of existence and as such is bound by the same laws of physics as we are and cannot see the future. Does that make any sense doc?"
"No. If god is living in our plane, isn't god also part of the, no sorry, isn't god the universal consciousness and as such completely aware of not just what happens in this plane, but the other six and also, I think by definition, capable of seeing the sum total of existence from all seven planes of existence as they have, as you explained, already happened?"
"Well, I guess we should put that on the list of questions, are there multiple gods for each of the seven planes, and are they in and of themselves individual or collective. Come to think of it, that is something I asked a long time ago, about whether there is but the one god."
"Yes, I remember. You stated god did not think you capable of understanding the answer. Well then again, god hasn't actually given you a definitive answer yet. We must look toward what else you have told me, that everything in the universe is part of the whole, even the part that broke away. I mean it's still part of the whole, right?"
"Yeah, I think you're starting to have an understanding of this doc."
"Well, maybe. I still think that god being the universal consciousness should know all past, and the future. You said god had access to the past, why not the future as well, it seems as though they are both part of the universe, past, and future."
"That's a perception of god that we aren't able to make. Is in fact the god with which I have been having conversations, the god of the entire universe, or just the plane of existence in which we now live, or perhaps each of the other six planes. Or also one can go further, is this god the god of the narcissistic part of the universal consciousness, or the remaining part, or of the whole? That's the bigger question I think."
"And what do you think Mr. Marshall, which is it?"
"Personally, without asking, and I haven't asked that one, I believe god exists for us in this plane, and the universe in its entirety as well."
"Then there should be an answer for my question."
He stood, look at her with a slight smile and glanced down at the impression his bottom had made in the chair.  He looked up at his court assigned psychiatrist and smiled fully now. Then he shocked her, "Doc, I think our time is up, but let me leave you with this thought until next time we meet. The thing is, I'm god."  And he turned and walked out the door.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Genetically Modified Plants and Animals are completely safe

We know this because the manufacturers tell us they are.  It's pretty simple, they have tested them, they proclaim them as completely safe, therefore they are.

Let's look at these corporate leaders of bioengineering technology in a little more depth.

Monsanto, the first company to market genetically modified products has been in business for over a century. Their first product, saccharin for the Coca Cola company.  They have existed mainly by manufacturing some of the worst chemicals known to mankind, from PCB's to DDT to Agent Orange to Dioxin.  It isn't the manufacture of harmful chemicals that in itself is bad, it is the FACT that Monsanto attempted to save money by wholesale dumping of byproducts, used PCB's and other industrial wastes into lakes, streams, waterways and into settlement ponds to infiltrate the groundwater instead of correctly handling and disposing of such wastes.  High temp incineration costs money, it's free to dump it into the water supply of local towns.  Monsanto is directly responsible for 98 of the EPA Superfund Sites that have been in the cleanup process for nearly forty years now at a cost to American taxpayers of ten TRILLION dollars.  Monsanto's contribution to cleanup of their illegal dumping, ZERO.  Currently Monsanto makes money from GMO seed production, herbicides and other farm chemicals, the manufacture of the questionable hormone rBGH which is outlawed in most of the industrialized world, weather data services, and not to be discounted, but a significant amount of revenue comes from suing farmers for patent infringement. 

Dow. is the largest manufacturer of industrial chemicals in the United States. They make some interesting things, napalm, nerve gas, a huge variety of plastics including styrofoam, and lately they have begun to buy up coal mining operations.  At one time they made pesticides and are responsible for nearly a quarter of a million deaths due to equipment failures and the release of said pesticides into the heavily populated town of Bhopal India.  To date, the company has refused to compensate a single person for losses of loved ones, pain suffering or anything related to the disaster. In the last ten years the EPA has begun an investigation into the decades of the company dumping dioxin into the Michigan waterways instead of using approved yet more costly disposal of the wastes.  They are also being investigated for over 250 deaths from chloropyrifos poisoning at their manufacturing plant.  Something they hid, and just compensated American workers to keep quiet about.  Dow now makes Genetically Modified crops for farmers.

BASF is the largest manufacturer of industrial, commercial and consumer chemical products in the world.  Not just old video tapes, but all kinds of plastics, pharmaceutical and farm chemicals.  Huge ties to Fascist Germany and for three decades after the war virtually all of the senior management were former members of the Nazi party.  The three manufacturing facilities in the US are rated as some of the worst in the world and since 2001 have been cited by the EPA 673 times for violations of environmental regulations.  BASF now makes Genetically Modified crops for farmers along with a whole host of chemicals for farmers.

DuPont started out making munitions and explosives.  Not a bad thing in itself, someone had to do it.  The company has the dubious and grand designation as being the company that has the largest ever civil fine assessed by the EPA for violating Federal environmental laws. The company is responsible for 20 of the EPA superfund sites.  Again, ten trillion dollars for the cleanup, money paid toward that cleanup by DuPont, ZERO.  In 2013 DuPont has been targeted as the worst contributor to air pollution in the US.  DuPont now makes Genetically Modified crops and farm chemicals.

Syngenta, was formed by the merging of the agrochemical divisions o AstraZeneca and Novartis.  They make dozens of pesticides of which many are banned in their home country of Switzerland. Paraquat and Atrazine beng the most recognizable.  Well, except for their neonicotinide pesticides that are now in the process of being banned in most EU nations.  Syngenta is lobbying hard to block the ban and has even gone so far as to threaten to sue EU leaders that vote for the block.  Syngenta is responsible for 18 of the US EPA Superfund sites and now produces Genetically Modified crops along with a whole host of agrochemicals.

These are the companies that control the destiny of food in the world today.  Each of them has horrific pasts, and some are not so exceptional in the present and their track records have been filled with lies, deceptions and disinformation. Each of them tells us that their products are safe, each of them backs up their claims with short term feeding studies.  The big question is do we believe them?  When qualified scientists do comprehensive long term studies the results give us very different pictures.

Who do we believe?

Monday, October 13, 2014

Knowledge, the internet is the true Renaissance Man

The Renaissance Man of myth and legend was a man that knew everything.  It may have been possible once, long long ago to have been able to acquire most, I doubt all, of the knowledge of mankind within one's lifetime.  The amount of knowledge then was pretty limited and really only covered a few subjects and branches of science.  So, it might have been possible.  In today's world, there are people that seem to have a claim to enormous knowledge and identify themselves as true Renaissance men.  I'm sure you know a few, they are people that we colloquially refer to as "Know-It-Alls".  I know a few, was married to one, and they are all around us penetrating social groups with their particular brand of uninvited oratory on every subject discussed and volunteering their own experiences and unsought opinions into conversations.  Some people reading my blog might think that describes me, however it isn't true, I am actually quite timid and withdrawn in groups and quietly offer my knowledge only when asked.  And, the big one, I am never afraid to say "I don't know."

We live in a marvelous age, the internet has become our Renaissance Mind.  It contains the sum total of available knowledge and it is there for us to learn at the touch of just a few buttons.  As a child I profess to spending hours and hours reading through the old Funk and Wagnells Encyclopedia that my mother got one volume at a time for shopping at a local grocer that offered them as a promotion, one volume at a time with a minimum purchase.  I read them all.  As a youth I was a knowledge junkie.  And a math whiz. To this day I know what this is    

Three semesters of college calculus and my overall GPA at the time I earned my Masters was just 3.78, probably because when I first went to college I took Fortran, and to this day I can't think like a programmer, it just isn't in my mind to do so.  I learned to speak Latin in high school, probably forgotten it all now, but software programming, wow, not for me.  But I do have a sort of analytical mind and I thrive on learning things.  Not so much geared toward the applied mathematics anymore, my drive for knowledge now encompasses a lot of cooking, as well as the stuff I write about here, how our government has failed the citizens and big agribusiness and drug companies have decided that money is more important than safety.  I think that the billions of dollars in fines levied against the drug industry for just those things justifies my concerns toward them.  However the agribusinesses just haven't killed enough of our citizens to attract our wrath and cause the regulatory agencies to bypass the prevailing system of corruption and actually perform their functions and begin to regulate the flow of toxins into our food supply.

No one can know everything, but the true Renaissance Men of our time are those that can correlate widely diverse bits of data and reach conclusions that ordinary people never would believe possible.  It all begins with thinking outside the box.  Here is a remarkable website that I just love. (Sciencelab) This site gives to the reader a ton of information about common (and not so common) chemical compounds used in industry.  Everything from cinnamon oil to mercury.  It also gives us the toxicity of those compounds.  And the fascinating study of the LD50 for each of them.  And let's differentiate that from the other toxicity study, the LC50.  This LC50 is more virulent and defines what amount in aerosol form measured in parts per million within the atmosphere, does it take with an exposure of four hours to kill fifty percent of test subjects, generally large mammals.  Our interest is in the LD50, or the amount of a compound that when ingested will kill fifty percent of the test subjects within a given time frame, generally the standard is two weeks.  This is interesting information.  Did you know that if you give rabbits 320 milligrams of cinnamon oil per kilo of body weight, that fifty percent of them will die.  Makes me think about how sick a lot of those people got from doing the internet stunt of swallowing a tablespoon of cinnamon on camera just to get on the net.

However this site also gives us really useful information about some of the toxins in our food supply, like one of my favorites, Azodicarbonamide.  I detail how nasty the stuff is here on my blog at this entry (Poison)   And this is just one of the multitudes of chemicals that the FDA has allowed into our food system, simply because some corporations want those chemicals and have found uses for them that make more money for them.  And there are a lot of them.  Just for fun, let's look at the most popular and widely used preservative in the food industry, BHA.  Look it up.  We see that it is a Class 2B carcinogen.  Testing shows it to be Mutagenic to bacteria and yeasts and the big one, chronic exposure causes system and organ damage.  It is the most widely used preservative in our food supply.  It kills bacteria, it's cheap, it has no discernible flavor on its own, and it is approved for use by the FDA. 

I believe the FDA needs to hire a few Renaissance Men to look at the internet more.  It would appear that they don't have ANY at all right now.

Thursday, October 9, 2014

Dixie Cup Consumerism

George Bernard Shaw - The truth is something that absolutely nobody will believe!

Surely we all know what a Dixie cup is.  The little paper cup on the sides of water coolers, use it once, then toss it into the bin.  Disposable objects purposed for one specific task.  Although in real life Dixie cups are used for a multitude of functions.  From mixing paints, to craft projects to portioning medications to, well, a myriad of things; their specific design  and construction is one that makes them, disposable.

Dixie cup has become sort of analogous with our society, disposable everything.  A plastic society, use once and throw it away.  It's been said that Lee Iacoca perfected the Dixie Cup car, exceptional marketing and design, but lasted only as long as the warranty and then was disposed of. Plastics along with the detritus of our disposable society fill our landfills, litter our country, and our oceans, and they are in fact, the legacy we leave our offspring.  Plastic people, we use them, then throw them away.  Not the Kardashians or tabloid fodder, who meet, mate, marry and say bye bye more often than most people change their pants.  But actual people.  We, the consumers of America, are disposable.  We are THE Dixie People. 

Back in the fifties, the FDA was inundated with huge numbers of applications to approve new additives for the manufacture of processed foods.  The FDA itself doesn't have the resources to test new food additives, and instead relies on the manufacturer of these chemicals to do comprehensive studies to determine just how safe they are for human consumption.  Just for fun, check out this site, it is the guidelines for scientific evaluation of new products for human use. (FDA Guidelines)  You would think that these are all pretty specific and if a company follows them to the letter, then the interpretation of the data will conclusively prove the efficacy of any compound so that it may be allowed into the food supply and added to the EAFUS list of chemical additives allowed in food (EAFUS list)  Right now, EAFUS lists over 3000 items.  Many are natural things, like Acai berries, cinnamon, Azodicarbonamide.  Oops, that last one really isn't natural.  I detail how toxic it is here- (FDA FAIL)  and show how this compound has been disallowed by the EPA for use in food, but because the manufacturer applied to the FDA to allow its use in bread making, it was allowed and added to the EAFUS.  That testing report, well all of the reports for any of the listings in the EAFUS are not available to the public.  However it must have shown a favorable interpretation of the raw data to be included, and let's not ever forget, interpretation of data is what science is all about.  

That's where human Dixie cups come in.  Realistically we might believe that any manufacturer paying money to test a new wonder drug or food additive might interpret the raw data in favor of themselves.  It's kinda like dating, we present the most favorable picture of ourselves to our prospective dating partner, and leave out all the bad info.  Plus the FDA guidelines again only call for 60 day testing on small groups of rats, there are no requirements for long term testing.  In fact the truth is that if we could find a viable use for some compound of lead to make food better, the FDA guidelines for testing for sixty days would show that our lead based ingredient would be perfectly safe.  It is however, a very nasty cumulative toxin, and sixty days of minute ingestion would not be long enough for the subjects to exhibit the effects of lead toxicity.  The obvious solution to the dilemma is for the FDA to approve the toxin and allow the Dixie cup population to determine if it kills them or not.

Sounds simplistic doesn't it.  And not at all true.  The FDA has never knowingly allowed a new drug or food additive into the system with the intention of determining whether or not it is safe.  It just seems like they do.  (Drug recalls)  Actually there is no such list for food additives, there is just the one, cyclamates.  The FDA hasn't ever rescinded approval for any other food additive on the EAFUS list.  700 of those additives are classed as Class II carcinogens, or worse, like the above blog entry for Azodicarbonamide, are chemicals that are banned in EVERY other country in the world and of which our own EPA bans the use in food.  

We are the Beta testers for the food industry.  The Dixie cup consumers.  We are the perfect test subjects for the food and drug industries.  There is research and testing data in the FDA archives for every single drug and food additive out there in use today, however that data is based on testing of each individual drug and additive.  The reality of our world is that we as consumers are exposed to multiple additives daily.  There is no testing required to determine what happens when large numbers of individual chemical additives are ingested on a daily basis.  We have no actual knowledge of how these chemicals interact within our bodies.  There is no way to definitively assess such a thing either.  The preliminary testing of sixty day feeding studies is horribly inadequate in itself, to attempt to define and test interactions of a large number of chemicals on the human body over long periods would be ridiculously expensive, and the data virtually impossible to accurately interpret.  

We are the Dixie cup consumers.  Someday, someone else will notice.  

Monday, October 6, 2014

Dolly, the first cloned sheep, and why we don't see her twins everywhere

July 5, 1996.  Scientists in Scotland announced the successful cloning of genetic material from a mammal, a domestic sheep.  She was genetically identical to the female sheep from which they took a tissue cell nucleus and caused it to grow into a live sheep.  She died seven years later.  Scientists have since cloned cows, horses pigs, mice. dogs and cats and they even cloned a racing camel.  Depending on your point of view, it's pretty exciting stuff, or some might call it interfering with the work of the creator.  Which in a way, it might be, as I have stated here before with respect to Genetically Modified foods; those scientists attempting to play god don't have the manual required to explain how to do it.  And are screwing it up big time.

A few pertinent points about cloning technology.  It doesn't work all that well.  In 2008 the FDA released a 968 page report in an attempt to alleviate any fears the public, well, anyone aware of the situation, might have had about consuming the meat, eggs, milk or whatever that comes from cloned animals.  It didn't really do so, there are more questions raised by the report than are answered.  The biggest question that I can think of is why are we still attempting this when it is such an obvious failure.  Well the FDA states that the science of cloning is inexact and that they even have a term for the errors that occur during the process "epigenitic dysregulation"  Which basically means that 90% of the cloned animals die or are born with abnormal or poorly developed lungs, hearts or other internal organs, and the big one, they have LOS  or what they have named Large Offspring Syndrome where the unborn grows so large it kills both itself and the host "mother".  The animals that survive birth often have circulatory system problems, failure to regulate their own body temperature and the common problem, failure to thrive.

The FDA has decreed that any such animal is okay to put into the food system for human consumption.  Well, that's only partially true.  The FDA stated in their report that they would ask that producers not use cloned animals for food and it was entirely voluntary as the FDA stated that "cloned animals were virtually identical to normal animals raised specifically for meat."  Except that elsewhere in the very same report they state that meat and milk differed and had "alterations in fatty acid composition and delta-9 desaturase {an enzyme that synthesizes fat} activity"  And again later "these changes imply that lipid metabolism may be altered"    Two companies, Cyagra and ViaGen already have cloned animals out in the dairy industry, and state that the animals are already at butchers for human consumption.  Their claim for the milk from cloned animals is perfectly safe even with this statement from ViaGen, "Milk from cows, sheep and goats are mixtures that are estimated to be composed of more than 100,000 molecules and that we will rely on federal nutrition labeling requirements to catch problems"

These are the same scientists that have defined the genetic code for humans, cows, sheep and goats and yet they can't analyze milk from genetically engineered animals to determine if it contains something that normal milk doesn't.  They also state that they will rely on federal slaughterhouse inspections to catch cloned animals should they be sent to slaughterhouses to be put into the food supply.  Because the FDA asks that rejection of cloned animals be voluntary.

Yikes!  I sort of thought that if you were raising a cloned animal, you would know it.  Perhaps they do.

Of course the theory behind cloning and genetically engineering animals is in itself flawed.  Big dreams about engineering cows that aren't susceptible to the man made prions causing mad cow disease (BSE) is noble, even if it's too little too late.  But scientists have lots of other concepts for animals, pigs that excrete 75 percent less phosphorous thus allowing them to use 33 percent less land, and enabling farmers to overcrowd the animals together even more.  Cows, pigs, sheep and poultry that grow at accelerated rates just like the recently approved genetically modified salmon that grow three times faster than normal salmon.  And for which no environmental nor long term feeding studies have ever been done. There are even scientists that are attempting to engineer dairy cows that secrete lysostaphin in their milk in order to prevent mastitis, which is a huge problem in the dairy industry that relies on the use of rBGH hormones to increase milk production.  All the while causing infections in the cow's udders that results in pus in their milk.  Yum, milk with antibiotics. Not sure if that's better than milk with pus. But then I don't drink milk.  And that's only one of the reasons why.

The basic problem with the entire concept of cloning genetically engineered animals is simple.  Mother nature isn't so cut and dried about her methods of infections and diseases.  If these guys are successful in creating a steer that can't be infected with prions for BSE or if they create a cow that won't ever get a staph infection and mastitis; what makes these guys think that mother nature won't mutate virus and bacteria.  It happens all the time.  Ebola, new flu strains EVERY SINGLE YEAR, the disease that mimics polio, but isn't polio.  Oh sorry, that one is just polio, the WHO just call it a new disease so they can get ever more funding to vaccinate the third world at a profit.  (My opinion only, not based at all on the mountains of evidence)  If farmers remove ALL genetic diversity from the farm by only raising cloned animals with one specific genotype, they are opening themselves up to massive losses from diseases that mutate to a strains that are infectious to that genotype.  With no diversity, ALL the animals will get sick.  Modern farm methods are based on containing all the animals in close confined quarters insuring the EASY spread of new diseases within the populations.  When scientists genetically altered food crops to kill insects that ate them and to withstand applications of weedkiller they never once considered the fact that the insects would become immune to the insecticide in the plants and that the weeds would thrive on the weedkiller as all have done.  It sure seems as though the scientists and corporate leaders are all short sided, or maybe just one sided and that side is profit driven science.  Once the world accepts new technology that soon fails, their scientists will produce newer more creative, perhaps more deadly replacements.

All I know is that I personally don't want to be the scientific world's guinea pig.  I should be able to opt out of being in their testing mode for humans.  I want their products labeled so that I don't have to buy them.  The FDA testing requirements for these new genetically engineered foods are totally inadequate.  Their requirement is that the corporation playing god and CREATING new animals and plants test the food for sixty days and to not even do it in a double blind feeding study.  It's all pointless, random and inaccurate, and yet our government uses those studies as gospel.  In 2010, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack was asked if cloned cows and their offspring were in fact now part of the food chain in America and his response was, "I can't say today that I can answer your question in an affirmative or negative way, I don't know.  What I do know is that we know all the research, all the review of this is suggested that this is safe."  What this says to me is that the FDA, the USDA, and let's throw in all the other regulatory agencies that oversee the health of Americans; do not have any idea nor have they been DIRECTED to regulate these new technologies that by definition, are going to FAIL and of which we do not at this time even know if they are harmful in any way.

So, I have looked and looked and have been unable to find just how many of Dolly's sisters did not survive during the process of creating her.  The FDA admits that 90% die.  That's ten years after the fact.

I shop at farmers markets, I eat organic food.  I'm not a lab rat guinea pig test subject being fed genetically altered food during my lifetime to see if it causes increases in cancer, heart disease, bowel problems or any of the huge numbers of problems befalling humankind today.  Oh, wait.  maybe that's the reason all of those things have increased in our population of late.  I don't know, I'm not a scientist.  I only look at statistics that they publish.

Friday, October 3, 2014

Dry Aged Beef,..... yep, that's it for the title

So most everyone I talk to says that life is pretty good.  The food they eat is good, great in fact, and they love it.  Yeah, it's true, they all think I'm nuts.  Everyone I know it would seem doesn't see anything wrong with the food available to us.  And that's the part that is so hard for me to understand.  When I bake bread, everyone loves it, they can't get enough of it.  They all say it's fantastic.  And it has no artificial additives.  When I make home made ice cream, everyone loves it, they all tell me that it is incredible and the best they ever had, and it has no artificial additives.  Two examples of my chosen lifestyle methodology of cooking that basically states that what we, as humans, did to our foods in the past, are what make good food for us today.   Aged beef is another one of those things.  Everyone likes the beef that is out there for sale, they even might at times say it's great, but when given prime dry aged grass fed beef, the difference is spectacular.

And that's the way it used to be, made without artificial additives.

So what makes aged beef so much better?  Well, let's look at it from a scientific point of view.  Food here on Earth is for the most part made of proteins, carbohydrates and fats.  Those are the basic building blocks of life and are all necessary for growth, fuel and maintenance.  We eat them.  For the most part, by themselves fats and proteins are pretty bland.   If you think about it steak tartare tastes like onions and black pepper, the actual beef is a very minor flavor component.  And fat, well, by itself, not much there.  But then when we add the element of heat, we get a whole different reaction.  That cooking in fact sets off a whole host of changes in your beef to enhance the flavor of the bland.  They are called Maillard Reaction and is what happens when the heat breaks down the amino acids and begins to caramelize the carbohydrate and sugars present in the flesh. Ahhhhhh, instant flavor.  A grilled steak is a wonder indeed.  When the proteins break down, one of the byproducts just happens to be glutamates.  Glutamates are nature's natural flavor enhancer.  We humans have taste sensitivity for salt, sweet, bitter, sour and the newest is the one called umami.  Which generally tastes the presence of glutamates.  Natural glutamates are not at all bad for us, but of course the processed and refined version, MSG is not so good.  But that's another story. (The MSG Story)  It bears repeating, so here it goes, glutamates, naturally occurring ones, are like arsenic in apples.  In their natural form, they won't hurt you.  Refined and concentrated, they will.

So, we have a way to increase the flavor components of meat, before cooking them.  Aaaaahhhh, now your interest is peaked, what on earth could that possibly be?  Well, it is in fact a method of preparing meat that has been around since human type beings left the forest trees and began to eat the scraps of predator kills to supplement their diet of starchy plants, seeds and tubers.  Aging.  Believe it or not, what first got early hominids to eat meat was because it was left to the scavengers and in fact aged a bit and the flavor enhanced enough for Paleo Joe to want to eat it.  Some of the things that happen to meat as it ages is that the naturally occurring enzymes within the tissues start to breakdown the connective collagens and the meat becomes less tough and stringy.  Naturally occurring yeasts and other microbes within the flesh begin to ferment the meat at a cellular level and what happens is that we get an increase (a dramatic increase) in the glutamates as well as the starches within the flesh are broken down into simpler sugars.  All of these things actually have more TASTE to them then what is available in plain fresh meat. And, here's the big one, this aging process in fact makes the flesh of animals more readily digested and releases more of the basic nutrients within the meat to be readily absorbed by humans.  So, old meat is better than fresh meat.  Not necessarily at the local watering hole where the fresh meat hasn't met you and might be more willing to let you buy them a drink, but meat that you consume.  I won't say eat for obvious reasons.

The big difference of course is that you can't go to the store and buy aged beef.  In today's money based food system it costs money to let meat sit on a shelf somewhere for the 8 to 12 weeks needed to allow all of these processes to come to fruition.  It won't happen at your local supermarket for several reasons.  The first is that time thing and the second is because the meat that comes from modern meat factories is not of high
enough quality to even begin the aging process.  The bacterial contamination of modern meat is a well documented fact and if stores were to attempt aging that stuff it would in fact become a cesspool of fecal contamination and NOT the wondrous product you desire.  And thirdly, the amounts of antibiotics fed to animals is enormous and the residual antibiotic content interferes with the actions of good bacteria that do all the work of aging. And no, the antibiotics don't stop the fecal bacteria from having a field day on your meat because for the most part, all those bacteria are now antibiotic resistant, which is another story altogether.  (Fecal Field Day)  Anyway, this all goes back to what our ancestors learned a long long time ago.  If you killed an animal, you hung it up in a cave and let it hang there for a while to age before you ate it.  This is a practice that goes on even today with most hunters.  If you shoot a duck, you hang it up by its feet for a couple days before you cook it.  A deer, hang it, let it age.  The longer the better.  And steers, well there are places around that will sell you aged beef.  It ain't cheap, but the finer things in life never are.

So, some people out there are thinking that they can just go out and buy a couple steaks in package and let them sit in the fridge for a month and they will be better.  Some people also have very poor comprehension of the written word.  You can't do that.  For a lot of reasons.  First, all of the above.  Modern meat is just plain nasty stuff.  Second, aging of meat is done with large base cuts as the aging process drys out and makes an inedible crust on the outside.  And the big one, if you were to put a big piece of beef in your home fridge, it would begin to taste like whatever was in there before.  Fish, pie, cake, sourkraut, whatever.  However, nothing is impossible.  You can age your own beef if you want.  If you have a separate fridge, it is possible.  Clean it well, get an hygrometer and put it in there.  Buy your grass fed beef in large full cuts from a reputable supplier specializing in beef that is NOT grown or finished in a CAFO. Get the biggest you can afford and that will fit in there.  Then do it.  hand it or put it on a rack so air can surround the entire chunk of meat.  Keep the humidity at 70% and keep the door closed as much as possible and 8 weeks after you stick it in there, take it our and shave off the outer crust and cut yourself the best steak you ever had.  Even I would eat it.

Monday, September 29, 2014

It's not nice to try and fool Mother Nature! Changes in bacterial populations

This is a weird place to start this essay about bacteria, but here goes.  I don't drink milk.  Back in the fifties immunology was in its infancy and since my father and eldest brother had severe asthma, one of the causes was thought to be milk.  Therefore the other children in my family unit were denied milk.  So I never developed a taste for the stuff.  Then later in life, I learned how the stuff was processed, and that just grossed me out to no end and I have never started to drink.  Well once, when living in Austin a few years ago I did happen upon a local raw milk dairy and I did drink some of their offerings, and was pleased with both the flavor and texture of the stuff.  And also the fact that it did not cause flatulence as some milk products do.  (As we know now raw milk contains the enzyme needed to digest the proteins to alleviate farting whereas in pasteurized milk the enzymes are destroyed by heating)(( the single reason why goat milk is better for you is that the enzyme survives pasteurization))  I think we will all agree that bacteria of the incorrect varieties and in too large a number are bad for us humans.  That's sort of the reason why the FDA has made interstate sales of RAW milk illegal and 28 states have banned the sale of raw milk within their own state as well.  Sort of.  It is in fact a very complex issue with the major dairy agrigiants pumping millions of dollars into the open hands of congress every year.  And congress then sets policy of the FDA and USDA for the benefit of the big guys, and destroying the competition of the little guys.  And it all centers around a few common bacteria.  (Watchdogs)

Esherichia Coli or commonly referred to as E. coli is one of the most common bacteria in the world.  It lives generally in the intestinal tracts of warm blooded animals.  Everywhere.  It has specific functions in the environment in which it exists, not the least of which are aid to digestion, maintenance of acidic environment and in no small measure, destroying pathogenic bacterial invaders.  This last bit is some pretty new and still somewhat contested research showing that our intestinal bacteria are in fact responsible for a major portion of our immune system.  The fact that they are so prevalent in the animal kingdom should be convincing evidence, but for many, the obvious is not enough.  Anyway, E. coli have a tendency to help in the digestion of plant material and are necessary for ruminants like cows to have in their systems in order for them to breakdown the feed into usable products.  Now comes the odd part of all this.  Scientists have isolated nearly 200 varieties of E. coli within six specific pathotypes.  For our purposes today we want to look at the Shiga-toxin producing E. coli, or STEC  types including E. coli O157:H7, one of the most troublesome strains found.  These little guys actually produce the very toxic Shiga toxin as their waste product.  Most of the reported hospitalizations from contaminated foods are from STEC from fecal matter through transmission via waterway overflow from large commercial feeding operations.  The unfortunate thing about all that E. Coli getting out into the world is that they not only now crap out toxins in the the form of Shiga, but that because the drive to produce really cheap meat has necessitated that the cows be fed huge amounts of antibiotics in an attempt to keep those STEC out of the cows themselves.  Definitely a revolving problem.  And those STEC then flow out onto fields of produce for humans and poof, fifty million people each year get sick from eating the stuff. 

I guess it's a good time to actually define the phenomena, we know E. coli and other helpful good bacteria live in your lower intestines, however if you ingest them, that is E. coli (and actually all intestinal bacteria) from other creatures that have entirely different strains, it causes problems.  Colloquially referred to as the Hershey Squirts, Montezuma's Revenge, The Runs, The Trots, The Squirts, The......, well you get the idea.  Diarrhea.  The CDC estimates that there are over 50 MILLION cases of food poisoning annually here in the US from humans eating food tainted with bacteria from sources that can be termed fecal contamination.  Nearly half a million people are hospitalized and here comes the big one, the FDA admits to 3,000 dying each year, the CDC tells us that 22,000 die each year.  Who do we believe, well, that is up to you I guess.  Does it matter?  No, not really.  What matters is that the contamination happens.  Here is a list of the Fecal Bacteria that are causing the problems here in America put out by the FDA  (FDA on Bacteria)  It's pretty comprehensive and as I think about it, I really don't need to identify each one as I had set out to do.  The thing that we need to remember is that modern methods of manufacturing cheap meat are the major cause of the Fecal Contamination of food in our society today.  And, the main reason the death rate is as high as it is as well.  When humans consume fecal contaminated foods, their bodies react to the bacteria populations and they get sick.  For the worst cases, the bacteria for the most part are now antibiotic resistant because of the huge amounts of antibiotics fed to livestock.  When you give antibiotics to animals to prevent diseases caused by horrific crowded living conditions, the bacteria that aren't killed outright by the antibiotics pass their resistance on to their progeny. 

So there we have it.  Right now you can go to the FDA website and then go to the CURRENT recall list of foods that have been recalled.  There is a list of all foods, drugs, pet foods and medical devices that have been recalled and the list is updated daily.  (FDA Recall site) The reasons for most of the food recalls, Salmonella, Listeria and other bacterial contaminants from animal feces.  Even though the EPA is charged with regulating the disposal of wastes generated from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, the agency does little to regulate the problem.  It is true that they spend an inordinate amount of time dealing with internal rule MAKING, and have established definitive GUIDELINES for agribusinesses to follow; however when it comes to enforcing those guidelines they haven't had a lot of success.  (EPA CAFO rules)  In fact agribusiness usually wins in courts when it comes to a question of human safety or spending money to comply with EPA CAFO regulations.  The 2008 decision of the Federal 2nd Circuit Court details pretty distinctly that agribusinesses don't need to worry about runoff effluent from their CAFO operations due to inclement weather conditions, such as rain. (2008 ruling) What this means is that when a giant agribusiness goes into the business of raising animals for milk, egg or meat production, that they are required by the EPA guidelines to set up a system to deal with the large quantities of animal waste produced.  In practice, the agribusinesses create large settlement ponds and dump most of the waste into the ponds and allow it to settle, ferment and decay.  Then they infrequently drain the water and scoop up the resulting sludge and use this to fertilize farmers fields.  However, if there are storms, and rain overflows the ponds into local waterways where the CAFO fecal material and sludge runoff can then contaminate other farms, or local municipal water sources, that is now, by ruling of the Federal Court, fine and dandy.

Realistically that's only part of the problem.  Live fecal bacteria are present on most of the meat for sale in stores nationwide.   Consumer Reports last year printed a report that stated that over half of the chicken samples from retail grocery stores had fecal contamination.  Visible fecal contamination.  97% of the chicken was contaminated with salmonella, listeria and other fecal bacterial contaminants.  Slightly less for beef and pork.  There's something wrong with our system.

I'll say it again for you, the solution begins with you.  When we as consumers begin (yes, BEGIN) to spend our food dollars with producers utilizing sustainable and healthy farming methods, most of these problems will disappear.  Local farmers, ranchers, dairymen and cottage food industry people make products for people, and do what they can to make sure people live another day to buy from them again.  Agribusinesses manufacturer food in the cheapest way possible, and they do it to make money for corporations.  You can be a part of the solution, think local, buy local, eat healthy.

thanks,  Chef Roy